Meaning
Labor or professional contributions completed before a current agreement cannot serve as legal consideration for a new promise under established contract laws. This principle ensures that value is exchanged specifically for the commitments made in the present document. Past services are viewed as already compensated or as gifts that cannot support a new binding obligation.
Compensation Problem
Founders frequently attempt to reward early contributors with stock once the company has reached a certain milestone. If the grant is based solely on past services, the agreement may lack the necessary value to be legally binding. This can lead to disputes during an audit or a sale of the company.
A new agreement should include a commitment to future work or a nominal payment.
Equity Issuance
Board directors must ensure that all stock grants comply with state corporate statutes regarding the type of value received. Using past services as the sole basis for issuing shares can result in the stock being considered watered or improperly authorized for issuance. This creates a cloud over the ownership table that must be cleared before an initial public offering or a merger.
Documentation must specify that the equity is for future contributions or a present purchase to remain valid.
Legal Restriction
Most jurisdictions do not allow the retroactive application of value to meet the requirements of a new contract. Because past services were not bargained for at the time of the new promise, they do not create a legal detriment for the provider. This boundary ensures that contracts are forward looking and based on current intentions.
It protects the firm from unexpected claims for back pay or equity.